Crossdressing?[]
Great job so far Dap. However, and this is to everyone, I have to call into question Chippy's sex.
First, there is nothing in the dialogue which provides a hint of the monkey's gender. Aside from Ron thinking it's Kim, no "he" or "she" is used in conjunction with Chippy.
Second, if Chippy had "he-male parts", at some point (easily at the movies, the way Chippy had lower body and dress kicked up to hold things) Ron was bound to have seen, and (hopefully) realize "he" was not Kim.
So I present that Chippy was in fact a female (and not *simply* because I plan to hook up she-Chippy with Frederick in a fic). Problem is of course aside from deductive and suggestive reasoning, and dress, canon fails to support either gender.
So at the least, the article should be re-worked to genderless wording.
Love Robin (talk) 08:41, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
- You make some excellent points, and I can't argue with any of them. Well, except maybe Ron, he should have known Kim would never wear that Nana dress, even as a monkey. But that Chippy did, and apparently looked good in it (I still don't see it, but whatever), is another good point. So I'll make the changes. - Dap00 11:15, February 4, 2013 (UTC)